On studying the political arena, It was obvious that Iran resisted both Democratic Communism and Democratic Capitalism at the same time since Ayah Allah Khomeini had took the leadership towards an established Islamic Iranian Cultured Revolution against the Shah Dictatorship.. Iran faced thereafter significant threats upon its geographic borders with Soviet Union and from the Western community trying to control it under the well known anti-Islamic hostile propaganda adopted by those democrats.. Democracy with its unethical elements, hypocrisy and/or corruption can not survive in Iran which cleverly - in its preliminary search - for an ideological and a contemporary political alternative; identified itself - within the English invented term - as theodemocracy.. In Our system Of thoughts and in lights of the Metaparaphysics Philosophic Theory / The Monotheistic Philosophic Theory (TMPT) which was applied upon studying the Religio-cultural nature and the socio-political system of governing; Iran is viewed as closer to be a Surecratic System than a theodemocratic System in governing; It was analysed in light of its own restructured Islamic Model of Governing: In model structure and mechanism(s) of functioning; It can be be stated that Iran - as a republic - is seeking its own invention as a revoutionary start towards finding out any needed preliminary elements and/or foundations in order to establish something close the Surecratic Polity Model and/or Surecracy in a certain under-developing progressive way..
From our political prospective Iran is considered - though being a small country - compared to others, yet it has played a very significantly intelligent / clever way(s) in international politics , starting by Iran Gate (Iran - Israel - CIA - Nicaragua ) which had shaken the president of USA and his election - at the time - where a strategic political game came to appear in its most significantly successful and influential way in facing a big democratic oponent USA , as the anti-Iranian / anti-Islamic league(s) varied - as hostile enemies - from the socialist democrats and the capitalists democrats at the same time .. In addition to the later East -West challenge Iran had faced Sadam Hussein Military violent non-ethical destructive war attacks for almost ten years and had also resisted it successfully till the Iraqi Sadami Dictator Communist -Like secular Regime collapsed on its own ! It was done side by side - with antagonizing the Soviet Union military pressures on its Iran boards - willing to intervene to turn over the Islamic government out there followed by the conspired threats of the Western of NATO lead by Tony Blair UK and George W. Bush USA in gulf War I and II .. Iran was more than once facing coercions and military threat of Democrats , side by side with western Delusive coercive media attacks and propaganda from those whom are structured minded with a unilateral dimension knowing nothing but only their views about their corrupted sliding down democracy; a matter which made young generations of democrats non-participant in believing in their own system .. Iran when the political and ideological threats or economic conspired sanctions arise seems to stick to its own basics / fundamentals of Shi'ite Jafari 12 Imams Mazhab which has its own religio-cultural Islamic-Ijtihad Interpretation(s) in Quran and Sonah .. Its official Islamic Mazhab had been accepted and recognized by the leadership of Sonnit Imams of Al-Azhar Supreme Authority (Cairo) Sheik/ Mohamed Shaltott whom officially persuaded that both Sonah and Shihatt people are required to unite - according to Qur'an -in facing the enemies of Islam and the Supporters of anti-Islamic Secularism .. Both Muslim Sonnet and Muslim's Shihatt Jafari are brothers and sisters in the same trunk of Islam.
Iran has its own legal legitimate rights not to follow the western democratic models that do not suit it , it has its own Religio-cultural and political legal rights to be different even from the Western Christian and Jewish democratic models .. To force it by the questionable non-accountable democratic biased views of others: whether socialist or capitalist democrats, it is in itself very offensive to the Muslims' people and the Islamic established state where here Iran - in light of the law - has the full legal rights to fight back the growing monopoly of democracy and/or democrats whom want to rule and to fully control the whole developing world with its human / natural resources and markets as if it is their own piece of cake to swallow ..!! Iran has same equivalent rights to grow, protect its religio-cultural , socio-political, national security and Iranian ideological beliefs which is different from others whom must respect its difference and sovereignty.. The stupidity and the troubles of democrats that they can not see the world from any angle except via their narrow unjustified / unrealistic vision(s) and/or through these hole(s) of secreting their own waste(s) ..?!!
What happens during the elections of Iran is the following Division(s) in the socio-political arena:
1. Fundamentalists Hard Core of Islam according to Shitte Jafari Mazhab whom represent a considerable high percentage of votes in the outcome of this election as declared and reviewed .. This core stepped in to be in the governing power of Iran Republic by an election during the times of USA - NATO war(s) threats, economic sanction trial(s) and military destructive invasions inside the Middle-East (Lebanon, Gulf War I & II ) to turn over Arabic - Islamic governments by military force(s) and by fragile illegal excuses in lights of both the Islamic and the International laws .. Accordingly Those Iranian Fundamentalists do strongly believe that the present president of Iran Ahmadinejad is accountable, truly honest, non-corrupt and even clever with his team to face the threats and to play a good rule in political external affairs enough to put Iran with an international recognized integrityand legitimacy, he was sucessfully working through many challenges in order to rebuild back his country stronger to protect it economically, politically, religio-culturally and in security especially against the foreign interferences, threatening conspiracy western invasions into Iran internal socio-political affairs. this group was capable of adopting the reasonable case that Iran as a legitimate Republic is not an anti-Semitic or anti-jewish; as their state respect the Jewish people but they are rather anti-Zionist ; being brought in Palistine by the conspiracy of Western Democracy of UK and others and lead by the secular Zionists frauding history and the socio-political strategic reality.. It seems the threats on one side brought up other counteracting threats upon the other Islamists side in Tahran and vise versa.
2. Moderate Iranian Islamists lead by Rafsangani as the second man of religious power and the hird man of political-ideological authority (ex-president in Iran) whose approach was to further smooth the relationships and links with others by moderation especially with Western Democrats. During this election Rafsangani kept quite, shortly most recently he talked criticising while still he knows by Islamic Laws that the election winning party is still legitimate in governing but he seemed by leaving at the begining - without his interference - the others including some of his relatives to go into the protest process against the results of this elections on their own - as they are responsible about their own choices in light of Islamic Shariah law(s) and as he is not - by nature as it looks - a dictator or a custodian by of others being a moderate man, he -himself does not show up to protesters with the mixed activists , a matter which means he rather preferred to keep religio-politically quite and/or to accept the results of this election where Ahmadinajat got the majority of votes close to 2/3 of the votes'counts .. the later Ahmadinajat criticised Rafsanjani by the public stories of Rafsanjani related corruption in building wealth in relation to his family related member when he was in power .. ! under any circumstances both leaders have some degree of tolerance to each other as it seems ..
3. The Third group is the secular group / group not bound with the majority can be identified as the opposition minority group which is mixed into its diverse subgroups including the Bahai minority some of which want a system like the Shah regime and/or the westernized -like democratic questionable regimes where it might be true to some extents that many of them and their immigrants link fully cooperate with UK, Canada, USA , NATO views and even to bring secular socialists ..etc. they all with their differences are activists gathered within the messy protesters that turned on the fires of the elements of anti- national security or (Fetna in Arabic langauage) to the stability and the security of Iran .. Such an internal affair of de-stabilization of the elected government was criticised by the first Religious leader Aaytt-Allah Kamani speach as well as by the elected president Ahmadijanat. The use of Iranian Police and/or Revolution guards and even the Iranian secret intelligence in order to prevent the country from going into a disaster - as Western Democrats are wishing - was legitimate by any government facing a similar situation protecting its country in lights of both the Islamic and the International laws .. This revolting mixed groups were acting opportunistically, taking advantage of the defeated minority party and related claimining presidency man, whom seem have declared his own personal desires to jump onto the chair of governing power .. We all remember the advice of The prophet of Islam : Mohamed Bin Abdul-Allah whom had stated clearly in his Hadith : Moslems should not ever grant the governing power to the one whom truly or personally desire it (want it by all the means ) for his own sake !.. Such an opposition does not have approximately 1/3 of the votes not even close to have half of the votes ( Bayha) of his own people. He played a simmilar joke or scenario that we have repeatedly seen in the elections of democracy especially in the west where a defeated man lost his own election stands for persuading his own people to turn over another legimate president or opposing regime for governing the country because of winning significantly this election campaign ..!
If George Bush and Tony Blair politically and millitary-wise have failed to drag Iran into another Gulf War II & III and/or encouraging the Israel Zionist State to do so.. and If the successor British Prime Minister and USA newly elected president B. Obama - under their deep economic recessions and under facing the global economic crises - know very well - that speaking the language of threats and military invasions' operations against Iran will take them now into no where but to a more disasterous political and economic grave collapse(s) .. It is obvious thereafter that they have nothing left to efficiently do or speak about except barking like dogs of democracy and its hypocrisy upon the so called Western Democratic questionable value(s) of freedom of Assembly and freedom to protest and to speach; while their history is recording still - under their international war against Islamic third world developing countries - that these values were in - fact - gravely infringed and repeatedly violated by their own double standards and their own hypocritic questioned practice(s) of the democratic governments as their cases in Europe UK, USA, even Canada (Maher Arar Case) ..etc. for example not for limitations; where the democratic individual freedom was oppressed , threatened and even violated in reality of their so called democratic freedom, by several illogical - controversial parliamentary bills against the individuals of their own people using national security where prisoners of war -in additions - were tortured , abused , killed , face illigimate / unfair trials by abuse of democratic governments and power .. Who believes in such a delusion of democracy .. who believe it is good for everybody ..! Who said that democracy can work with Islam which is Surecratic ?!! Moslems must wake up because they have their own integrity and their different socio-political and cultural identity that must be allowed to redevelop , grow and exist with a full respect ? We have seen enough of controveries brought by all forms of such a hypocritic delusive non-working democracy in practice and its theories that fails even to collapse in many dimensions in their democratic actual reality ?! Democracy seems to be surviving on its lies and own delusions that have brought to the world - in both theory and practice - a lot of disasters and/or troubles..!
It will be a joke for a Muslim or an Islamic Government to claim it is democratic for the reasons we have highlighted in our other articles and/or publications ?!! Democracy is not accountable enough for its own people . democracy brought so called free and in reality there is no free market but collapses due to its economic theories of greedy explotations for the dummies who believe in its democratic delusions? The World must wake up and must revolt against this monopoly of democracy with its two faces democratic communism and democratic capitalism is not suitable for everybody else especially for Muslims whom are very different in their own religion, their system of thoughts, philosophy, economy of markets and in culture ..
If Iran has highlighted that the UK and Westerns are trying to encourage their servants' activists to turn over the Islamic Regime step by step starting from moderation with the westerns then into secular democracy as it has happened in Islamic History of Turkey / Ottman State under hands of Kamal Attatork - Conspiring with British Empire - following World War I, Now both USA and UK have been trying in Gulf War II to drag Iran into Gulf War III and put thereafter their full control over our people and our governments to further manipulate our resources, economy and the Islamic Culture of our independent Muslim people .. We have the legal rights to be different and the freedom according to the guidelines of Quran and Sonnah Of Rasoul Allah .. No body is supposed to tell us what to do or to bent down to kiss the feet of the invading violent NATO / USA soldiers ( professional war killers) .. We have seen enough of the Democratic Delusions, double standards and fake .. I guess in conclusions that USA /UK and NATO if failed to destroy the Islamic Theodemocratic (By Iranian Developing Definition ) or the Islamic Surecratic Political and Religio-cultural Developing System (from our definition in lights of TMPT theory) ; the Western has nothing left - in light of its political and socio-economic crises except to politically work undertable via their intelligence , popetts and their loyal anti-Islamic activists as Iran has eventually highlighted this dipolomatic issue against UK embassy and/or to use some misleading norms brought within the such controversial democracy which can not stably withstand on itself; it all happens while using the unilateral media and biased fraudulent Western Democratic Propaganda that sees the whole world solely from their narrow hole(s) of secreting their own wastes ..!!
Written by : Sherif Abdel-Kerim , B.Sc.& M.Sc.Pharm.
Founder Of The International Surecratic Movement (ISM International)
Calgary,Alberta, Canada ..
Copyright (C) June 2009.
Reference:
1. The Truth Behind Ahmadinejad's Victory Part 1/4, Part 2/4, part 3/4 and part 4/4
start by this link for a view about reality of election and president's simple life
Posts
